At every occasion perps will label victims mentally ill based on the same stereotypical arguments.
Sooner or later you will have to counter these silly arguments.
On this page we try to find the answer.
The following questions are often asked by psychiatrists.
Some people are harassed for a clear reason:
For other people there may be a different reason. Some targets are chosen at random. For example, they choose 1000 people. They irradiate them with frequency X while their interior is sprayed with product Y. After 10 years they make a statistic to see the average result.
What matters most to the stalkers is to get the stalking groups together.
Some stalkers choose a complete stranger. This is called stranger stalking.
The harassment has more effect when it’s unjustified, so they will often choose an innocent person.
Targets don’t deserve the harassment just like children don’t deserve to be raped.
It isn’t that you’re worth it. It’s because they’ve got so much to protect.
It doesn’t require much time. The stalkers can do small things while they are doing their job.
We have no idea what it costs.
If 1 in 70 people is a target, and they shoot all these targets and dump them in a mass grave, then they are not respectable anymore. The whole affair seems to revolve around the word respectable.
How is it possible that you hear the messages while standing in a group of people who don’t hear them?
You need to be able to hear high frequencies.
It is dependent on your orientation to the source.
It is dependent on the size and shape of your head.
It is dependent on the acoustic properties of your brain tissue.
Microwave voice to skull is RECEIVERLESS communication.
Dr. Lawrence Pinneo (Ph. D. which?) claims that verbal thinking is nothing more than subvocal speech: speaking with your mouth closed and without actually making your vocal chords vibrate. See subvocal recognition.
So if you hear voices while you don’t do any mechanical effort to create those words, then it may be voice to skull.
Visual hallucinations are typically three-dimensional.
Pictures sent by the technology are typically two-dimensional.
They don’t target prominent figures because they are already mind controlled.
They don’t use this against terrorists because they are cowards, and they prefer easy jobs. They prefer to harass the helpless who would never strike back.
Some targets succeeded in appearing on TV. This always turns out bad.
A good example is the story of Pan and Song on Guizhou Satellite TV.
Another good example is the story of Kevin Bond on MSNBC-KMIR6.
Wikipedia is a particularly nasty place for targets. The rules of Wikipedia have been designed to promote the perps and to bash targets.
These are a few articles that need to be debunked:
Electronic harassment (42.0 K, 2 pages).
The original article was 100% positive for targets. It referred to the laws of Maine and Michigan.
In the current article nothing of the original article is left. It’s 100% negative for targets.
The article fails to address the laws of Maine and Michigan. Russia has a law against electronic harassment since 2001. Did they vote a law for something that doesn’t exist?
There are a few notorious cases of electronic harassment.
James Tilly Matthews (100.7 K, 4 pages).
This is a single case study. You can’t make a statistic with a single value.
What he claimed wasn’t technically possible in his time. What we claim, has also been claimed by patents. This means that the Patent Office believes that it’s doable. So the situations may not be compared.
Nikola Tesla lived in the same time as James Tilly Matthews. The claims of Nikola Tesla were much wilder than those of James Tilly Matthews.
On the origin of the influencing machine in schizophrenia (65.5 K, 3 pages).
On the origin of the influencing machine in schizophrenia by Victor Tausk (3.2 MB, 23 pages).
There are patents which claim that they can do exactly the main effects of the influencing machine, and more.
Interestingly, the pictures that are projected by the influencing machine, are two-dimensional, unlike hallucinations, which are typically three-dimensional.
Stalking (159.4 K, 13 pages).
The study by Lorraine Sheridan is garbage. It’s based on old data that had been rejected in an earlier study because they were suspected to be stalkers who pose as a victim. A study of what people write on the internet is also different from a study of patients in a hospital.
The other statements don’t hurt our cause.
© 2017 Cliff Huylebroeck