Countering the perps

At every occasion perps will label victims mentally ill based on the same stereotypical arguments.

Sooner or later you will have to counter these silly arguments.

On this page we try to find the answer.

Contents

  1. Most pertinent questions
  2. TV appearances
  3. Wikipedia

Most pertinent questions

The following questions are often asked by psychiatrists.

Contents

  1. Why you?
  2. Did you do something wrong?
  3. Did you do something to deserve the harassment?
  4. Are you so important?
  5. Why would they spend so much time on harassing you?
  6. Why would they spend so much money on harassing you?
  7. Why don’t they shoot you?
  8. Why are you the only one who hears voices?
  9. How can you hear voices without receiver for energy waves?
  10. How do you see the difference between voice to skull and your own thoughts?
  11. How do you see the difference between visual hallucinations and the technology?
  12. Why don’t they target prominent figures?
  13. Why don’t they use this against terrorists?

Why you?

Some people are harassed for a clear reason:

For other people there may be a different reason. Some targets are chosen at random. For example, they choose 1000 people. They irradiate them with frequency X while their interior is sprayed with product Y. After 10 years they make a statistic to see the average result.

What matters most to the stalkers is to get the stalking groups together.

Some stalkers choose a complete stranger. This is called stranger stalking.

Did you do something wrong?

The harassment has more effect when it’s unjustified, so they will often choose an innocent person.

Did you do something to deserve the harassment?

Targets don’t deserve the harassment just like children don’t deserve to be raped.

Are you so important?

It isn’t that you’re worth it. It’s because they’ve got so much to protect.

Why would they spend so much time on harassing you?

It doesn’t require much time. The stalkers can do small things while they are doing their job.

Why would they spend so much money on harassing you?

We have no idea what it costs.

Why don’t they shoot you?

If 1 in 70 people is a target, and they shoot all these targets and dump them in a mass grave, then they are not respectable anymore. The whole affair seems to revolve around the word respectable.

Why are you the only one who hears voices?

How is it possible that you hear the messages while standing in a group of people who don’t hear them?

  1. You need to be able to hear high frequencies.

  2. It is dependent on your orientation to the source.

  3. It is dependent on the size and shape of your head.

  4. It is dependent on the acoustic properties of your brain tissue.

How can you hear voices without receiver for energy waves?

Microwave voice to skull is RECEIVERLESS communication.

How do you see the difference between voice to skull and your own thoughts?

Dr. Lawrence Pinneo (Ph. D. which?) claims that verbal thinking is nothing more than subvocal speech: speaking with your mouth closed and without actually making your vocal chords vibrate. See subvocal recognition.

So if you hear voices while you don’t do any mechanical effort to create those words, then it may be voice to skull.

How do you see the difference between visual hallucinations and the technology?

Visual hallucinations are typically three-dimensional.

Pictures sent by the technology are typically two-dimensional.

Why don’t they target prominent figures?

They don’t target prominent figures because they are already mind controlled.

Why don’t they use this against terrorists?

They don’t use this against terrorists because they are cowards, and they prefer easy jobs. They prefer to harass the helpless who would never strike back.

TV appearances

Some targets succeeded in appearing on TV. This always turns out bad.

A good example is the story of Pan and Song on Guizhou Satellite TV.

Another good example is the story of Kevin Bond on MSNBC-KMIR6.

Wikipedia

Wikipedia is a particularly nasty place for targets. The rules of Wikipedia have been designed to promote the perps and to bash targets.

These are a few articles that need to be debunked:

Contents

  1. Electronic harassment
  2. James Tilly Matthews
  3. On the origin of the influencing machine in schizophrenia
  4. Stalking

Electronic harassment

PDF file icon Electronic harassment (42.0 K, 2 pages).

The original article was 100% positive for targets. It referred to the laws of Maine and Michigan.

In the current article nothing of the original article is left. It’s 100% negative for targets.

The article fails to address the laws of Maine and Michigan. Russia has a law against electronic harassment since 2001. Did they vote a law for something that doesn’t exist?

There are a few notorious cases of electronic harassment.

James Tilly Matthews

PDF file icon James Tilly Matthews (100.7 K, 4 pages).

This is a single case study. You can’t make a statistic with a single value.

What he claimed wasn’t technically possible in his time. What we claim, has also been claimed by patents. This means that the Patent Office believes that it’s doable. So the situations may not be compared.

Nikola Tesla lived in the same time as James Tilly Matthews. The claims of Nikola Tesla were much wilder than those of James Tilly Matthews.

On the origin of the influencing machine in schizophrenia

PDF file icon On the origin of the influencing machine in schizophrenia (65.5 K, 3 pages).

PDF file icon On the origin of the influencing machine in schizophrenia by Victor Tausk (3.2 MB, 23 pages).

There are patents which claim that they can do exactly the main effects of the influencing machine, and more.

Interestingly, the pictures that are projected by the influencing machine, are two-dimensional, unlike hallucinations, which are typically three-dimensional.

Stalking

PDF file icon Stalking (159.4 K, 13 pages).

The study by Lorraine Sheridan is garbage. It’s based on old data that had been rejected in an earlier study because they were suspected to be stalkers who pose as a victim. A study of what people write on the internet is also different from a study of patients in a hospital.

The other statements don’t hurt our cause.

 

© 2017 Cliff Huylebroeck Belgian flag